Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Prospector option to select between form fill and doc creation #244

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Nov 14, 2024

Conversation

momuno
Copy link
Member

@momuno momuno commented Nov 14, 2024

  • document agent - to account for message type of None for welcome message scenario (and future others?)
  • prospector chat - removing command, adding workflow branching, support welcome message scenario for doc agent.
  • prospector config - add workflow option for form fill or doc creation.

…s and for not providing outline itself. Update logic in doc agent to track turns of step and pass info to gc artifact
… (decoupling to occur later). Address final fixes.

doc_agent = DocumentAgent(attachments_extension)
await doc_agent.receive_command(config, context, message, metadata)
pass
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If we're just going to pass here, consider just deleting this handler until if/when we want it.


# # Prospector assistant response
# await respond_to_conversation(context, config, message, metadata)
if config.guided_workflow == "Form Completion":
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd invert this since form completion is our desired default. Maybe consider using a match w/ the form completion as the default.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ohh i like the match idea

bkrabach
bkrabach previously approved these changes Nov 14, 2024
@momuno
Copy link
Member Author

momuno commented Nov 14, 2024

to finish testing tomorrow. so far looking good (with an added fix)

@momuno momuno marked this pull request as ready for review November 14, 2024 19:06
@momuno momuno merged commit c6739eb into microsoft:main Nov 14, 2024
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants